Legal Opinion

Jones v. Lacey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1930No. 6 Div. 448PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

In order to pass intelligently upon this case, the bill should set out to whom the property was assessed for local improvements, as provided by sections 2191 and 2192 of the Code of 1923. From aught appearing, it was assessed upon the book to the complainant or the class to which he belongs and represented by him, and, if such was the case, they would be bound thereby. Grant v. Birmingham, 210 Ala. 239, 97 So. 731. The bill does aver that no notice was served On the complainant or relatives of deceased persons buried in said lot, but this is no charge that the assessment was not made and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Huntsville v. Madison CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. King Lumber Co. v. SpragnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Bank of Henry v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Grant v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Frazier v. FrazierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Jasper v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Jefferson County v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. City of Birmingham v. TerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. May v. GrangerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Cowan Inv. Corp. v. City of FlorenceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API