Legal Opinion

May v. Granger

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 21, 1932No. 4 Div. 607PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill was for injunction to prevent the sale under execution of' complainants’ lands. Demurrers thereto were overruled; hence this appeal.

The grounds of demurrer were to the effect (1) that the bill does not allege that R. T. Granger did not know of the judgment within thirty days after its rendition; (2) that the bill does not allege that he had a meritorious defense to said suit and the note declared upon; (3) that complainants had an adequate remedy at law; (4) and that there was a' misjoinder of parties complainant.

Considering these questions in inverse order, there was no misjoinder…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Sweeney v. TritschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long v. LaddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. Floyd v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. De Carli v. O'BrienOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. City of Birmingham v. TerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Taylor v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API