Legal Opinion

Pavelka v. Overton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1932No. 3746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

In cause No. 3268, M. C. Overton, as plaintiff, sued appellants as defendants for $378, with interest. According to the plaintiff’s petition herein, said debt arose by reason of the following transaction: Plaintiff and defendants (appellants) exchanged lands, and each of their separate tracts was under in-cumbrance. Defendants’ lands were in Hale county, Tex., and were represented to be incumbered in the sum of $3,100.60, but, as a matter of fact, it was incumbered for $3,478.-60, causing plaintiff to obligate himself to pay the difference of $378, the amount for which he sues, and plaintiff…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McCarty v. HumphreyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Western Mortgage & Investment Co. v. JackmanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hare v. ReilyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. First Mortg. Loan Co. of San AngeloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. School District No. 28 v. E. H. Stafford TrustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API