Legal Opinion

Western Mortgage & Investment Co. v. Jackman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1890No. 6520PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Hays. Tried below before Hon. H. Teichmueller.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

—A demurrer to the petition in this case was sustained upon the ground that the court did not have jurisdiction of the cause of action. Whether that ruling be correct or not is the sole question presented upon this appeal.

In 1885 S. D. Jackman executed a promissory note payable to the appellant, the plaintiff in the court below, and in order to secure its payment at the same time executed a mortgage upon a tract of land which is described in the petition. He subsequently died and appellee W. T. Jackman was appointed and qualified as administrator of his estate.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Timmins v. LacyTexas Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Gregory v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. O'Neil v. NortonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. George v. Ryon, AdministratrixTexas Supreme Court · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API