Legal Opinion
Hesperia Citizens for Responsible Development v. City of Hesperia
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 30, 2007No. D049614PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AARON, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
Respondents City of Hesperia (City), City Council of the City of Hesperia (City Council), and the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency (Agency) entered into a municipal services agreement (MSA) with the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe (the Tribe). The purpose of the MSA was to govern the provision of municipal services to a gaming facility the Tribe was hoping to build within the City of Hesperia and within the Agency’s redevelopment project area. Hesperia Citizens for Responsible Development (Citizens) filed a first amended complaint in which it alleged that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Iverson v. Muroc Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Trop v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Whaley v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Redevelopment Agency v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sandell v. Taylor-Listug, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Amn Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bareno v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Brenner v. Universal Health Servs. of Rancho Springs, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Camacho v. Target Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.