Legal Opinion

Camacho v. Target Corp.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 8, 2018No. D073280PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAaron, J.

*226*293I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Adrian Camacho appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Target Corporation (Target) on Camacho's causes of action for discrimination based on sexual orientation, harassment causing a hostile work environment, failure to prevent harassment and discrimination, retaliation, constructive termination in violation of public policy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, negligent hiring, supervision, and retention, and a violation of the Bane Act ( Civ. Code, §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Flait v. North American Watch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Castillo v. Alere North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
  2. Ford v. The Silver FCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. McKenna v. BeesleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Quiroz v. World Variety Produce CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Rashid v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API