Legal Opinion
Latta v. Miller
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1887No. 12,141PublishedCited by 17 opinions
From the .Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowe, J.
In this case, the appellee Miller, administrator of the estate of Jacob Beckner, deceased, sued the appellants, Latta and Sparklin, in a complaint of four paragraphs, upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“$790. Goshen, Ind., April 27th, 1881.
“Fourteen months after date, we promise to pay to the order of William C. Miller, guardian of J. Beckner, seven hundred and ninety dollars, at our office, for value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws, with seven per cent, interest from date until paid, and attorneys’ fees. (Signed) Latta &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. ShrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Weyer v. Second National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Dawson v. CoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Thomasson v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Hamrick v. CravenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. EvistonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.