State ex rel. Roadway Express v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Two issues are presented for our review: (1) Did the commission abuse its discretion in continuing Getz’s TTD from August 29, 1986 until October 10, 1990? and (2) Is Roadway entitled to reimbursement from the Surplus Fund under former R.C. 4123.515 and 4123.519? For the reasons that follow, we hold that the commission’s April 25, 1988 TTD award is invalid and that Roadway must be reimbursed. Accordingly, we affirm.
Abuse of Discretion
Roadway argues that the commission had no basis upon which to continue Getz’s TTD once it had effectively determined his condition to be permanent and at maximum…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Cordray v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Ascani v. Stark County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Ascani v. Stark Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. King v. Summit County CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. Couch v. Trimble Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.