Ober v. Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.". '
Plaintiff herein is the holder of a promissory note in the sum of $1000, one of a series secured by a deed of trust on certain real estate. Defendant Ober purchased the property on which the note was secured without assuming or becoming personally liable thereon. However, when the note matured he secured an extension of the time of payment, and thereafter successive extensions to November 16,. 1937, on each occasion signing an agreement wherein he assumed and agreed-to pay the note. These agreements were on the same printed form, the last dated January 23, 1937,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shepherd v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Rey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Cucullu v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bergmann v. RollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Kaufman v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. KrochmalDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970