Legal Opinion
United States v. Krochmal
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 21, 1970No. Civ. No. 19378PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
In this action the United States seeks to recover $3,208.16, plus interest, under a “guaranty” by defendants of a promissory note held by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as assignee of the payee bank. The issue presented is whether defendants have been released from their liability by reason of the stipulated facts.
On August 22, 1961, Flair-Acorn, Inc., executed and delivered to the Security Bank, Washington, D. C. (the Bank), its promissory note in the principal amount of $15,000 with interest as therein provided, payable in monthly installments of $250.00…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arlington National Bank v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Bergmann v. RollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Kaufman v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Howard National Bank & Trust Co. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
- Empire Millwork Corp. v. LapidesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Frank J. Beardslee and Frances M. Beardslee, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- McGill v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- General Electric Credit Corp. of Tennessee v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Knight v. CheekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. BildmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.