Legal Opinion
City of Marietta v. Bigham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 6, 1945No. 31753PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff in error, defendant below, from a judgment of the district court ■of Love county wherein defendant in error, as plaintiff, recovered judgment against defendant for personal injuries. The parties to the appeal will be here-' inafter referred to as they appeared in the trial court. In view of the conclusion we reach it will not be necessary to discuss any of the assignments of error other than that the trial court erred in not sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the evidence of the plaintiff.
In plaintiffs petition it is alleged that «on November 10, 1941, while…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Bristow v. PinkleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Hale v. City of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCathern v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Evans v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Nellie Lou Lillie, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Rider v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- City of Woodward v. MitchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.