Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frosty Bites, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 1, 2002No. 02 CIV. 1682(WCC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & G”) and others 1 bring this action against defendant Frosty Bites, Inc. (“FBI”) for a declaratory judgment that USF & G has no duty to defend or indemnify FBI against patent infringement claims asserted against it in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. 2 USF & G now brings this motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 determining that it has no duty to defend or indemnify FBI against these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- A. Meyers & Sons Corp. v. Zurich American Insurance GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dish Network Corp. v. Arch Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Auto Sox USA Inc. v. Zurich North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Auto Sox USA, Inc. v. Zurich North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frosty Bites, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frosty Bites, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.