Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frosty Bites, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 6, 2002No. 02 CIV. 1682(WCC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.

Defendant Frosty Bites, Inc. (“FBI”) moves pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) and 60(b) for reconsideration of this Court’s November 1, 2002 Opinion and Order granting the motion of plaintiffs United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. and others (“USF & G”) for partial summary judgment determining that USF & G had no duty to defend or indemnify FBI for patent infringement. U.S. Fid. and Guar. v. Frosty Bites, Inc., 232 F.Supp.2d 101 (S.D.N.Y.2002). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants reconsideration in part of the November…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frosty Bites, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frosty Bites, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frosty Bites, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API