State v. Gorham
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawfully taking a deer. ORS 496.162; ORS 496.992. He contends that the court erred by denying his motion to dismiss on the ground that he was immune from prosecution. He also contends that the court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence that was seized during a warrantless search of his barn. We affirm.
We take the historical facts from the court’s findings and the evidence that is consistent with them. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487, 443 P2d 621 (1968); State v. Huckaba, 115 Or App 728, 730, 839 P2d 768, rev den 315 Or 272 (1992). Officer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Hilt v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State of Oregon v. HennesseyOregon Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. GorhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. HockemaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014