State v. Roper
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
After defendant was charged with a number of counts related to the manufacture, delivery, and possession of marijuana and methamphetamine, and felon in possession of a firearm, the trial court granted his motion to suppress evidence based on the officers’ warrantless search of defendant’s premises. The state appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to suppress because defendant did not manifest a clear, intent to exclude visitors from using his driveway. In light of all the circumstances, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. RhodesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. PortreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. GabbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- United States v. HolmesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- State v. CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.