Legal Opinion

State v. Hockema

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2014No. 11CR0075; A148940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

This appeal arises following a stipulated facts trial that found defendant guilty of 11 counts of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, one count of unlawful possession of MDMA,1 ORS 475.874, and one count of unlawful possession of marijuana, ORS 475.864. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of two deputy sheriffs’ initial entry onto defendant’s property. We conclude that the entry was lawful, and affirm.

We review the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress for errors of law. State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 10, 115…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. GabbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. SomflethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API