Legal Opinion

Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial Board

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1917No. 10849PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Writ oe Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Lockwood Honoré, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooke

George Garls, one of the defendants in error, was on November 1, 1913, injured while in the employ of the Pekin Cooperage Company, the plaintiff in error. Thereafter, on July 8, 1914, a committee of arbitration appointed under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act decided that Garls was entitled to receive from plaintiff in error compensation at the rate of $6.64 per week for a period of thirty-four weeks from November 8, 1913. Upon review, had upon the petition of plaintiff in error, the Industrial Board approved and confirmed the decision of the committee of arbitration and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suburban Ice Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chicago Dry Kiln Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Matter of Newman v. . NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Claim of Gleisner v. Gross & HerbenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Claim of Verschleiser v. Joseph Stern & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API