Legal Opinion
Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 26, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 659-57PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiff, a resident of the State of Virginia and a member of the bar of the District of Columbia, sues the defendant, a New Jersey corporation, for a contingent fee for services upon a written agreement between the parties embodied in a certain letter dated May 27, 1955, from defendant to plaintiff. A copy of this letter is *419annexed to the complaint and is quoted here, as follows:
“Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Co., Inc.,
“95 Essex Street Maywood, New Jersey.
“May 27, 1955
“Mr. Thomas Gray
“1720 ‘Eye’ Street, N. W.
“Washington, 6, D. C.
“Dear…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New York Sash & Door Co. v. National House & Farms Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Soper v. BilderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
- Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- In Re FrankelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958