In Re Frankel
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hehek, J.
The respondent attorney-at-law, in practice at Asbury Park, was ruled to show cause why he should not be disbarred or disciplined for violations of sections 28 and 34 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, as found by the Honorable Lester A. Drenk, Judge of the County of Burlington, in a report made to this court under date of September 6, 1955, pursuant to a reference made June 23, 1955.
Judge Drenk reported that the respondent Erankel and one Low had entered into and pursued an arrangement for the “procurement of automobile negligence cases by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Infante v. GottesmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Matter of WeinrothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- In Re PajerowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- In Re JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.