Legal Opinion
People v. Rodriguez y Paz
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shirley R. Levittan, J.
The principal legal issue raised on this motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to an eavesdropping warrant is whether Justice George Roberts, an Acting Supreme Court Justice sitting in a Centralized Special Narcotics Part of the Supreme Court located in one judicial district, has the authority to issue an eavesdropping warrant which is to be executed in another judicial district. An ancillary issue raised on this motion is whether the New York County District Attorney had the authority to apply for an eavesdropping warrant that was to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. Di PasqualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. Fusco, New York County Courts1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LillaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
- People v. Rodriguez y PazNew York Court of Appeals · 1983