Legal Opinion

People v. Fusco

New York County Courts

Decided October 17, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHabold M. Spitzes, J.

The defendant, Pasquale Fusco, has made five omnibus motions to suppress evidence; all of the 49 defendants join in these motions. Each motion is addressed to one of a series of five interrelated wiretap orders issued in 1972. The first order was issued by the Hon. Paul Kelly on April 25, 1972 authorizing the interception of communications made over a telephone being used by defendant Tim Gabriel, otherwise known as court order No. 3-72, hereinafter referred to as GO-3. On May 18, 1972, the Hon. Frank A. Gulotta authorized the interception of communications made over a phone used by two males…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas Fury and John QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. AloiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
  3. United States v. LillaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
  4. People v. AversaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. Rodriguez y PazNew York Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API