Legal Opinion
Warford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided December 21, 1994No. Civ. 94-5080PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.
This matter is presently before the court for resolution. The parties have stipulated that the court may decide the case on the basis of the materials presented without the need for a trial.
Plaintiff has made demand on State Farm for underinsured motorist coverage in the amount of $50,000 contending that such coverage is implied by law in view of defendant’s failure to make- such insurance available. Defendant contends that underinsured motorist coverage was made available to the plaintiff and that she rejected the coverage. Alternatively,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shelter Mutual Insurance v. BoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- American Casualty Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Nixon v. H & C Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Birchfield v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Lucky v. Equity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Majors v. American Premier InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Colonia Underwriters Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Druzella Warford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm Insurance Companies)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Day v. Tri-State Delta Chemicals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2001