Legal Opinion

Colonia Underwriters Insurance v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 8, 1996No. 96-330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Justice.

This case involves an interpretation of the underinsured motorist coverage statute. Ark. Code Ann. § 23-89-209 (Supp. 1995). Appellee Darrell Richardson was involved in an accident with an underinsured vehicle. At the time of the accident, Richardson was insured by appellant Colonia Underwriters Insurance Company (Colonia). Richardson filed suit against Colonia alleging that he was entided to underinsured motorist coverage in the amount of $25,000. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Richardson on the basis that he was entided to underinsured…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. QuirkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Lucky v. Equity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Hertlein v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Ross v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. IrvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Calcagno v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Soufi v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Majors v. American Premier InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API