Legal Opinion
Nixon v. H & C Elec. Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 4, 1991No. 91-148PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
This appeal involves the interpretation of our underinsured motorist statute. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 29(l)(c). Charlotte Nixon Berry was injured in a car accident on December 4, 1987. Appellants Bobby and Lois Nixon, as parents and next friend of Berry, sued appellee H & C Electrical Company for damages caused by its employee, Wayne Head, while acting within the scope of his employment. H & C Electrical Company’s insurance policy limit was $65,000. As there were other persons injured in the same accident, appellants anticipated that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chandler v. Perry-Casa Public Schools District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Nathaniel v. Forrest City School Dist. No. 7Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- MFA Mutual Insurance Company v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Morris v. Valley Forge InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of WynneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Dillard v. Resolution Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Shelter General Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- American Casualty Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.