Oregon Racing Commission v. Multnomah Kennel Club
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The defendant, Multnomah Kennel Club, has, since 1933, conducted greyhound racing meets as a licensee of the Oregon Racing Commission. As authorized by statute, pari-mutuel betting is engaged in at these meets. A brief description of the system of betting may be found in City of Portland v. Duntley, 185 Or 365, 375-376, 203 P2d 640. This suit was brought by the State of Oregon, through the Commission and the State Land Board, to obtain a declaratory decree that large sums of money retained by the defendant over the years for payment to winning wagerers who have never collected their bets…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Schweigert v. Beneficial Standard Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Holberg v. Westchester Racing Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Wise v. Delaware Steeplechase & Race Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Insurance Co. of North America v. KnightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Marsh v. Nebraska State Board of AgricultureNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- DePasquale v. Ogden Suffolk Downs, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.