Legal Opinion

Oregon Racing Commission v. Multnomah Kennel Club

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1966PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The defendant, Multnomah Kennel Club, has, since 1933, conducted greyhound racing meets as a licensee of the Oregon Racing Commission. As authorized by statute, pari-mutuel betting is engaged in at these meets. A brief description of the system of betting may be found in City of Portland v. Duntley, 185 Or 365, 375-376, 203 P2d 640. This suit was brought by the State of Oregon, through the Commission and the State Land Board, to obtain a declaratory decree that large sums of money retained by the defendant over the years for payment to winning wagerers who have never collected their bets…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Schweigert v. Beneficial Standard Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Holberg v. Westchester Racing Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Wise v. Delaware Steeplechase & Race Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. KnightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Marsh v. Nebraska State Board of AgricultureNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. DePasquale v. Ogden Suffolk Downs, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API