Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OlabksoN, I.

The record discloses a distressing situation. The plaintiff was married to defendant W. N. Reynolds II on 8 August, 1932, and they lived together as husband and wife until the latter part of May, 1933. In May, 1933, the mind of W. N. Reynolds II became so affected that his wife, the plaintiff, was compelled by reason of his mental condition to live separate and apart from him. It was necessary to place him in an institution for treatment, as he had dementia prsecox, and it is impossible for his condition to improve — it is incurable. In Yirginia, his domicile, the court in that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Spencer v. . McCleneghanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Holton v. HoltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. In Re HybartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Bohannon v. TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Ritchie v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Bohannon v. . TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. North Carolina Baptist Hospitals, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API