Legal Opinion

Holton v. Holton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

From the record we take it that the deed to the land was made to husband and wife, plaintiff and defendant in this cause. The application and order tendered the court so states. The court below, from the application and order tendered, made no error in refusing to sign the order.

“If any husband shall separate himself from his wife and fail to provide her and the children of their marriage with the necessary subsistence, according to his means and condition in life, or if he shall be a drunkard or spendthrift, or be guilty of any misconduct or acts that would be or constitute cause for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. West v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Hood v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Johnson v. . LeavittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Byrd v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API