Legal Opinion

Concord Oil & Gas Co. v. Thompson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1929No. Docket No. 114, Calendar No. 34,422PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On February 3, 1928, the defendants •Henry and Marie Smeltekop, husband and wife, entered into a lease of 40 acres of land in Muskegon county to one E. L. Dee, granting to him the right to mine and operate for oil, gas, and gasoline thereon for the term of two years thereafter. The plaintiff has acquired all rights thereunder by proper assignments. Among the provisions therein were the following :

"The party of the second part agrees to commence a well on said premises within six (6) months from the date hereof, or pay at the rate of forty ($40) dollars, for each additional six months such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bettman v. HarnessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. J. J. Fagan & Co. v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Dill v. FrazeIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Thomas v. Standard Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Epperson v. HelbronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hill v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Nelson v. Big Rapids Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Clovis v. Carson Oil & Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1935
  5. Steed v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API