Legal Opinion

Hill v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 28, 1949No. 16,091PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This case involves the construction of an oil and gas lease. The record discloses that on August 31, 1943, Ernest Oldland gave lease on customary producer’s 88 form, dated that day, to Joe T. Juhan. The recited cash consideration was $10.00, which was paid. The lease was for a term of five years, on customary one-eighth royalty, and provided that if no well was commenced on or before the 31st day of October, 1943, the lease should terminate unless lessee should pay to the lessor or to the lessor’s credit in the First National Bank at Meeker, Colorado, the sum of $320.00 which should operate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ryan v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Parish Fork Oil Co. v. Bridgewater Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hornick v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. C. L. Whitelock v. Delbert LeathermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Valentine Oil Co. v. PowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Kugel v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API