Legal Opinion
James S. Jackson Co. v. Horseshoe Creek Ltd.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1982No. 5677PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROONEY, Justice.
James S. Jackson Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Jackson”) sought to intervene as of right pursuant to Rule 24(a)(2), W.R.C.P., 1 in an action filed by Horseshoe Creek Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Horseshoe”) against James A. Ludvik (hereinafter referred to as “Lud-vik”). The purpose of the action was to rescind an assignment of a contract for deed made by Horseshoe to Ludvik. In its motion to intervene Jackson asserted that it was a judgment creditor of Horseshoe and that Horseshoe had promised to assign it a security interest in the contract for deed.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Atlantis Development Corporation, Ltd. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Robert Blake v. Sant Pallan v. Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yeager v. ForbesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Curless v. CurlessWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Samuels v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ColleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- James S. Jackson Co., Inc. v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.