Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

New York & Richmond Gas Co. v. Prendergast

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 18, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This application is to confirm the report of the special master, who, after hearings and full consideration of the issues presented in this cause, in a carefully considered opinion, held that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment adjudging unconstitutional and void the provisions of chapters 898 and 899 of the Laws of 1923.

Chapter 898 provides: “Service Charges Prohibited. Every gas corporation shall charge for gas supplied a fair and reasonable price. No such corporation shall make or impose an additional charge or fee for service or for the installation of apparatus or the use of apparatus…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
  3. New York Telephone Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  4. International Ry. Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
  5. In Re Wickwire Spencer Steel Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API