Caitlyn E. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court terminated a mother’s parental rights to two of her Indian children. She now appeals, contesting the qualification of the ICWA-required expert witness and the finding that OCS made active efforts to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. Because the superior court’s decision to qualify the expert witness was not an abuse of discretion, and because the superior court’s active efforts finding was not erroneous, we .affirm the termination of the mother’s parental rights.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Caitlyn E., a Yupik woman,'lives in Bethel…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Maisy W. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Barbara P. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- L.G. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Brynna B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cora G. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS, Justin D. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Bill S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Mona J. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Ronald H. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Oliver N. v. Department of HealthAlaska Supreme Court · 2019