Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Perrigo Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 5, 1996No. 1:95-cv-00141PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Facts. 683

Discussion. 684

1. Attorney-Client Privilege. 684

2. Work Product Immunity.¡. 686

3. Abrogations of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Immunity. 686

a. Fiduciary Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege. 686

b. Fiduciary Exception to Work Product Immunity. 687

c. Substantial Need and Undue Hardship..-. 687

4. Waiver. 688

a. Attorney-Client Privilege. 688(1) In Camera Review. 688(2) “At Issue” Waiver. 688(3) Disclosure to Third Parties. 689

b. Work Product Immunity. 689

5. Public Access to Court Records. 690

Conclusion. 693

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

This case…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Columbia/Hca Healthcare Corporation Billing Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. In Re Perrigo CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Cobell v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. Lindley v. Life Investors InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
  5. In re Om Group Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API