Legal Opinion

Margarito v. Bridgeport Hospital

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 20, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00281Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ARELIS MARGARITO, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-cv-281 (VAB) BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL, Defendant. RULING AND ORDER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Arelis Margarito (“Plaintiff”), pro se, has sued Bridgeport Hospital (“Defendant” or “the Hospital”), alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”), on the basis of race, sex, and age. Compl., ECF No. 1 (Feb. 15, 2018). Bridgeport Hospital has moved for summary judgment. Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 34 (Feb. 10, 2020). Ms.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API