Legal Opinion · Concurrence

L.J.K. v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 23, 2005No. CR-04-0060Published

1ConcurrenceShaw, Judge

I concur in the main opinion, which correctly cites and applies existing caselaw from both this Court and the Alabama Supreme Court interpreting Rule 28, Ala. RApp.P. I write specially to note that as recently as four months ago, in Beckworth v. State, [Ms. CR-02-1077, August 26, 2005] - So.2d -(Ala.Crim.App.2005), cited in the main opinion, this Court unanimously held that an argument challenging the sufficiency of the evidence that does not include citation to any legal authority fails to comply with Rule 28. In that case, Beckworth made the same argument that L.J.K. makes here — that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hallford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. Vinzant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Hamm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. Carnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API