Legal Opinion

Hallford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 10, 1993No. CR-91-596PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Phillip D. Hallford, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during the course of a robbery. §13A-5-40(a)(2), Code of Alabama 1975. He was sentenced to death by electrocution. We affirmed his conviction in Hallford v.State, 548 So.2d 526 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), after searching the record for plain error. Rule 45A, A.R.App.P. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed, EX PARTE Hallford, 548 So.2d 547 (Ala. 1989), and the United States Supreme Court denied…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Hamm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. State v. TarverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API