Legal Opinion
Carnold v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided February 28, 1992No. CR 90-974PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
The appellant, Douglas Edward Arnold, was convicted of first degree theft and was sentenced as a habitual offender to imprisonment for life. He was also ordered to pay $500 to the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund and to pay $370 in restitution. Six issues are raised in this appeal from his conviction.
I
The appellant asserts that the indictment is defective in that it did not sufficiently inform him of the degree of theft with which he was charged. This argument is…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte WindsorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Ex Parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.