Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Raytheon Employees Disability Trust
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 4, 2000No. CIV. 98-595-BPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BARBADORO, Chief Judge.
Francis Garcia brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), to recover benefits allegedly due to him under the terms of the Raytheon Long Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”). Garcia alleges that the decision of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), the claims administrator under the Plan, to terminate his disability benefits was arbitrary and capricious. Before me are Garcia’s motion for judgment on the administrative record (doc. no. 19) and defendants’ motion for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Michael F. Terry v. Bayer Corporation and Bayer Corporation Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Ralph Block v. Pitney Bowes Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- The Sheppard & Enoch Pratt Hospital, Incorporated v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Colón RiveraDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Robinson v. UNUM Life Ins.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
- Smith v. Fortis BenefitsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003