Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fortis Benefits

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 6, 2003No. CV-02-055-BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Smith v. Fortis Benefits CV-02-055-B 03/06/03 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE William Smith v. Civil No. 02-055-B Opinion No.

2003 DNH 035

Fortis Benefits Insurance Company MEMORANDUM AND ORDER William Smith brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1) (B) (1999), to recover benefits he alleges are due to him under the terms of a long-term disability plan insured and administered by Fortis Benefits Insurance Company ("Fortis") . Smith alleges that Fortis' decision to deny him benefits was arbitrary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Cook v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. The Sheppard & Enoch Pratt Hospital, Incorporated v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API