Legal Opinion

Gold Seal Importers, Inc. v. Morris White Fashions, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 20, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

This action relates to the alleged infringement of design letters patent No. 125,540, issued February 25, 1941, on the application of Leo Friedman, filed January 27, 1941, and thereafter assigned to the plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction was granted on the ground that infringement of the patent was clearly apparent on comparison of the defendant’s bag with the patent in suit. The patent was also held valid as disclosing a pleasing ornamental design evidencing invention and not anticipated by any of the art disclosed in the opposing papers.

Though…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. A. C. Gilbert Co. v. ShemitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Strause Gas Iron Co. v. William M. Crane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. Neufeld-Furst & Co. v. Jay-Day Frocks Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  5. Steffens v. SteinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gold Seal Importers, Inc. v. Morris White Fashions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Gold Seal Importers, Inc. v. Morris White Fashions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  3. Olsen v. Baby World Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1954
  4. Mary E. Cearley v. General American Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API