Loomis v. Zoning Commission

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiffs in these two cases-have moved for the dismissal of the defendants’ appeals because of their delay in filing briefs. In the-first case, the named defendant’s brief became overdue on March 4,1957, and the motion to dismiss was-filed on May 1,1957. In the second case, the defendant’s brief became overdue on November 19, 1956,. and the motion to dismiss was filed on May 9, 1957. In neither case was an extension of time for filing-briefs obtained. In the first case, the failure to file-the brief when due or thereafter is treated in the motion as a ground for dismissing…