Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Warden, State Prison

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 21, 1991No. 14119PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.

The petitioner, Todd Douglas, filed an amended writ of habeas corpus alleging that the Appellate Court’s dismissal of his appeal had violated his federal constitutional rights to due process and to the assistance of counsel, and requesting that his appeal be reinstated on the Appellate Court’s docket. The habeas court dismissed the petition on the grounds that the Appellate Court had not deprived the petitioner of his constitutional rights and that the habeas court lacked authority to restore his appeal to the Appellate Court’s docket. We affirm.

The facts are as follows. After a jury trial,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PhiddConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. Robert H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API