Legal Opinion

People v. Ryan

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1940No. Crim. 4236PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, J., pro tem.

Appellant, with others, was jointly charged with violating subdivision 2 of section 337a of the Penal Code. Ryan was found guilty. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, an appeal was taken to the District Court of Appeal. The transcript of the proceedings of the trial court as presented to the appellate court clearly showed that at the time of pronouncing judgment the court found appellant guilty of a violation of subdivision 3, section 337a, of the Penal Code. The appellate court, in reviewing the record, held the judgment defective because the defendant had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. TuttleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. NovellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. State v. CarusoNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1942
  3. People v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. People v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. HamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API