Legal Opinion

People v. Tuttle

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1938No. Crim. 3120PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, J.—Defendants

were charged with the crime of violation of section 337a, subdivision 2, of the Penal Code, in that they “did wilfully and unlawfully keep and occupy a room, . . . with . . . books, . . . and papers, apparatus, device and paraphernalia, for the purpose of recording and registering . . . bets on the skill, speed and power of endurance between beasts, to-wit horses”. At a trial before the court without a jury both defendants were found guilty. They prosecute this appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

Defendants argue that the evidence is insufficient to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. ReifenstuhlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. State v. Masato KarumaiUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. WarnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. BarnhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API