Legal Opinion

People v. Hames

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1959No. Crim. No. 6601PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Appellant Wallace Hames was accused of three violations of section 337a of the Penal Code, namely, Count I, violation of subdivision 1 (bookmaking), Count II, violation of subdivision 2 (occupying a room with betting paraphernalia), and Count III of subdivision 6 (accepting bets on horse races). In a court trial, under stipulation, the *674cause was submitted on the transcript of evidence received in the preliminary examination and the testimony of one of the officers who testified at the preliminary and was called by the People at the trial. Defendant was convicted under Count II and Counts I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. RabaleteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. People v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API