Legal Opinion
AQUAPAW BRANDS LLC v. PUSIFICA
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 12, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00538Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AQUAPAW BRANDS LLC, Civil Action No. Plaintiff, 23-cv-538 v. PUSIFICA, et al., Defendants. OPINION Before the Court is Plaintiff Aquapaw Brands LLC’s (“Aquapaw”) Motion to Amend the Final Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction previously entered as to Defendants Cuddlez_productz, Loki Plays, and YaoXinChungShiYaoZhenShan (the “First Default Judgment Order”). ECF No. 84. In its Motion, Aquapaw asks the Court to amend the First Default Judgment Order to include the remaining Defendants in this case (collectively, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.