Legal Opinion
Ernst v. Burdick
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 2004No. 20040104, 20040105PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Ronald R. Ernst appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his claim for damages against Birch Burdick, Brett Shasky, and Sherri Arnold for disseminating criminal history information about him to the media, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12-60-16.6 and related statutory provisions. Ernst also appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his claim for damages against Burdick for allegedly disseminating the same criminal history information a second time, after Ernst had filed his action against Burdick, Shasky, and Arnold for disseminating that information. We hold…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Stout v. Fisher Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Wren v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Azure v. Belcourt Public School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nancy G. Holmes v. Trinity HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Holverson v. LundbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Vogel v. Marathon Oil CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Empower the Taxpayer v. FongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Markwed Excavating, Inc. v. City of MandanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.