Legal Opinion
Vogel v. Marathon Oil Corporation
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 2016No. 20150154PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McEVERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Sarah Vogel appeals from a district court judgment dismissing without prejudice her complaint against Marathon Oil Company. Vogel argues her claims should not be dismissed because she has a private right of action for violations of the statute restricting the flaring of gas 'produced with crude oil from an oil well, N.D.C.C. § 38-08-06.4, and she was not required to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm.
I
[If 2] Marathon operates the Elk USA 11-17H well in Mountrail County. The well began producing, hydrocarbons in 2011 and continued producing through at least…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Medcenter One, Inc. v. North Dakota State Board of PharmacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Ritter, Laber & Associates, Inc. v. Koch Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Continental Resources, Inc. v. Counce Energy BC 1, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Zerr v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- GEM Razorback, LLC v. Zenergy, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Olympic Financial Group v. ND Dep't of Financial InstitutionsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.