Empower the Taxpayer v. Fong
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Empower the Taxpayer, Charlene Nelson, and Robert Hale (collectively “Empower”) appeal from an order dismissing their request for injunctive relief against numerous state and local government officials and other entities. We affirm, because Empower has failed to establish that there is a private right of action to enforce the provisions of the North Dakota Corrupt Practices Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 16.1-10.
I
[¶ 2] Empower supports North Dakota Initiated Constitutional Measure 2 to abolish property taxes which is on the June *3832012 primary election ballot. In February 2012,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Brandvold v. Lewis & Clark Public School District 161North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- District One Republican Committee v. District One Democrat CommitteeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vogel v. Marathon Oil CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Empower the Taxpayer v. FongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Empower the Taxpayer v. FongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- The Woodmont Company v. LaSalle Shopping Center, LLCDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2020
- Vogel v. Marathon Oil CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016