Metz v. Todd
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal iu Chancery from Calhoun Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, Ch. J:
This is a foreclosure suit. The mortgage was given by •defendants Helen G-. Todd and Alice M. Terry, to secure the payment of four promissory notes made by third persons, and which the mortgagors had delivered to complain*474ants on a purchase of the land mortgaged. The .bill avers that the four notes were delivered to the complainants “as security for the payment of the purchase price,” and that the mortgage was taken at the same time to secure the payment of the notes. It is claimed by the defense that the notes were received in payment for the land, and that the purchasers were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neimcewicz v. GahnNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Christner v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fanning v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Nelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Union Stove & Machine Works v. CaswellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Wayman v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Higgins v. Deering Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.